Showing posts with label Nook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nook. Show all posts

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Nook: Shall I Compare Thee to a Summer's Day?

Warning: picture swiped from unsuspecting blog. I'm currently reading the unexpurgated From Here to Eternity, not whatever happens to be showing on this Nook's screen.

The (frankly to me) stale arguments about the Kindle/Nook/Kobo readers versus the iPad/Galaxy Tab/whatever usually center on the user experience reading outside: the passive E Ink screen on Kindle/Nook/Kobo is easy to read in bright sunlight while the iPad and its android imitators use the same LCD displays that smartphones use -- and we all know what it's like trying to do anything useful on a smartphone in bright sunlight.

But since it happens to be Summer and I'm doing more than a little Nook 3G reading out of doors these days I've discovered an advantage and a disadvantage of using an ereader of any stripe while sitting on the porch or by the pool.

Disadvantage: I'm not inclined to take my Nook to the pool ... and that would go double for taking it to the beach.  A friend of my daughter's recently made the mistake of jumping into a pool while holding her cell phone.  Result: il ne marche plus!  (It no longer works!)  No, I've not yet reached my dotage and am fairly sure I wouldn't forget to put down my Nook before diving in, but forgetting it by the pool and exposing it overnight to a passing storm?  A definite possibility.  Or leaving it on a chaise near enough the pool so that my teenage daughter and her rambunctious friends (including the one who jumped in the pool holding her phone) might splash water all over it?  A definiter possibility.  And I don't even want to think how well my already obsolete but still fairly expensive to replace ereader would handle beach sand.  That's what mass market paperbacks were made for -- those suckers are beachproof. (However, the endearing disposability of mass market paperbacks hasn't saved their market share from precipitous decline as ereader popularity has exploded, as this  New York Times article makes clear.)


Advantage: On the other hand, while reading on the porch the other day and enjoying a breeze while sipping a drink I realized I didn't have to hold my Nook firmly in my hands or worry about the wind blowing the pages and losing my place. I could put the device on a table, read away, and from time to time bring refreshment to my lips without thinking twice about what a sudden gust might do to my place or my equanimity. Fringe benefit: no need to risk creasing the spine of a book you love in a vain attempt to windproof it by getting it to lie flat, lowering its profile, and minimizing sudden-breeze page drag.

Since these observations are, as nerds like to say, device agnostic (i.e., they apply universally to the ereading experience regardless of the device you're using), they're not likely to change anyone's mind about whether to go active or passive in choosing a display.

To me the E Ink/LCD decision remains largely monetary -- though I read somwhere recently that iPad buyers tend to be male and dedicated ereader buyers tend to be female.  Regardless of gender, is there any doubt iPad owners are likely affluent, while dedicated ereader owners, at least since prices have fallen toward the $100 mark, likely aren't?

No matter: I'm interested in knowing what you ereader users out there have found are the Summertime advantages and disadvantages to your device, regardless of whether it's a Nook, Kindle, Kobo Reader, iPad, Galaxy Tab -- you get the idea.  Please comment and let me know.  Thank you.

Friday, June 24, 2011

Quoth the Rowling, 'Pottermore.'


I'm posting this entry largely because I thought of the headline while walking the dogs yesterday and found it rather clever, since that repeated line in Poe's "The Raven" reads "Quoth the raven, 'Nevermore.'"

In case you hadn't heard, J.K. Rowling of Harry Potter fame is opening this fall a new web site called Pottermore (pottermore.com) that will, among other things, offer heretofore unknown ebook versions of all the Harry Potter novels.  At the moment it's unclear whether Pottermore will be the place you'll have to visit to get the ebook version of any of the seven novels in the series or whether you'll also eventually be able to download them from Amazon or BN.com or any other ebook retailer.

If you'd like to get the details from Rowling herself, check out her Olympian announcement on YouTube.  (What's Olympian about it?  Click through and you'll see.)

ADDENDUM: It hadn't occurred to me that if Rowling is going to sell Harry Potter ebooks direct to her Pottermore visitors there's an inevitable question: how will they show up on a Kindle or Nook or Kobo or Sony or other ereader?  After all, each of these devices is part of a walled garden ecosystem.  I've sideloaded my share of public domain titles into my (now quaint first-generation) Nook 3G, but doing so involves a level of techno gruntwork Rowling will certainly not expect of her fans.  Thanks to today's edition of Publishers Lunch, however, we learn that Barnes & Noble.com is "working closely with Pottermore to make Harry Potter ebooks available on our line of NOOK devices when the Pottermore store goes live."  (Amazon has no comment on its plans.)  Publishers Lunch also mentions that the Financial Times has reported that Pottermore will be selling downloadable Harry Potter audiobooks now sold on Apple's iTunes store -- and that iTunes will stop selling them when Pottermore begins.  (Curiously, I just fired up iTunes and could find only one Harry Potter audiobook, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, now on sale there.)  Meanwhile the planet's English-language brick-and-mortar booksellers are in despair.  Harry Potter has been a godsend for them -- generating foot traffic from millions of shoppers eager to claim the latest installment and, presumably, one or two other books plus maybe some stationery, a jigsaw puzzle, a board game, a DVD, and so on.  Pottermore seems certain to stem that revenue flow, perhaps irrevocably.

BTW: if you haven't read Poe's "The Raven" since high school when, like me, you found it a tedious and irrelevant 19th century fossil, by all means give it another look.  It's really an extraordinary poem: inventive, ruefully amusing, with a manic intensity, helped along by its meter and profuse rhyme scheme, that builds as it goes along.  When I first re-read it a couple of years ago -- only because my daughter was assigned it in her English class -- I could scarcely believe it was the same poem I'd sleepwalked through in 11th grade American Literature.  I doff my hat to you, O divine Edgar.